Translating Complex Science
Into Clear, Evidence-Based Communication
Medical Writing • Scientific Communications • Medical Affairs
Explore PortfolioEvidence. Story. Strategy.
Medical affairs-ready scientific writing built for claims discipline, fast review cycles, and real-world use.
I translate clinical research, guidelines, and real world evidence into clear, review-ready deliverables for medical affairs, education, and cross-functional clinical teams. Expect disciplined terminology, traceable sourcing, and clean QC.
Target roles: Medical Writer • Scientific Communications • Medical Affairs Content • Medical Editor • Clinical Education Developer
Training
MMSc (Clinical & Translational Research) + MPH (Public Health)
Execution
5+ years evidence-based clinical content under deadline workflows
Standards
ICMJE · GPP3 · AMA-aligned drafting and review readiness
Verification
Guideline-first synthesis + traceable sourcing (primary literature)
Featured Work
Flagship Deliverables
Representative work across evidence synthesis, education assets, and medical affairs enablement.
Clinical Narrative + Evidence Summary
Guideline-first synthesis with claims framing, endpoint literacy, and citation discipline to support fast SME review.
Medical Affairs Enablement Pack
Field-facing FAQs and slide narrative structures designed for internal alignment, consistent terminology, and defensible sourcing.
Clinical Education + Assessment Assets
Case-based materials with measurable objectives, unambiguous decision logic, and structured rationales for consistent evaluation.
Recruiter Snapshot
Fast evaluation, minimal scrolling
A compact view of fit, deliverable range, and review workflow approach. Direct links are embedded as text (buttons are only top and bottom).
Deliverables
Medical affairs-ready outputs with claims discipline:
- Evidence summaries, therapeutic briefs, landscape overviews
- FAQs, briefing documents, platform/key message support
- Slide narratives, congress summaries, publication-style writing
Review System
Built for speed without losing rigor:
- Guideline-first synthesis + primary literature confirmation
- Claims-to-source alignment + terminology control
- Tracked changes, versioning, decision logging
Core Services
Medical Writing • Scientific Communications • Medical Affairs
Deliverables designed for credibility, review readiness, and real world use. Built with disciplined terminology and source traceability.
Medical Writing
Evidence + Publications
Publication-grade writing that protects scientific intent, claim integrity, and clarity under review.
- Manuscripts, abstracts, posters, congress summaries
- Literature reviews, evidence tables, annotated bibliographies
- Endpoints and safety/efficacy framing with appropriate limitations
- QC: claims-to-source checks, terminology consistency, version discipline
Scientific Communications
Education + Clarity
Audience-specific communication for clinicians, learners, and cross-functional stakeholders that is accurate and usable.
- Teaching decks, training resources, internal education
- CME/CE outlines, learning objectives, facilitator notes
- Guideline summaries and therapeutic landscape briefs
- Data-to-slide narrative structuring for rapid review
Medical Affairs Support
Strategy + Enablement
Modular tools that support scientific exchange, internal alignment, and field readiness.
- Scientific platforms, core claims, key messages
- FAQs, briefing documents, advisory board materials
- Slide narratives, Q&A preparation, insight-ready summaries
- Review cycle support with templates and clean handoffs
Workflow
A Quality System Built for Medical Review
A repeatable process that keeps scope, sources, and stakeholders aligned and supports efficient review cycles with defensible outputs.
1) Define the Use Case
Audience + intent
Align audience, channel, and decision point so the deliverable is clinically relevant and appropriately technical.
- Scope, outline, success criteria, and review pathway
- Terminology rules and definitions control
- Reference plan and claims expectations
2) Extract and Structure Evidence
Traceability
Build from source materials first, then draft with citation discipline and consistent terminology.
- Study design, endpoints, limitations, applicability
- Claims framing and reference alignment
- Clean narrative structure for fast SME review
3) Review, QC, Handoff
Submission ready
Iteration with tracked changes, version control, and QC that protects accuracy and audience intent.
- Feedback reconciliation and decision logging
- Consistency checks across modules and slides
- Final clean files and traceable source trail
Credentials
Academic Training and Scientific Rigor
Interdisciplinary training supporting evidence accuracy, clinical relevance, and high-impact medical communication across research, education, and operations.
Education
Degrees
- MMSc, Clinical & Translational Research, Medical College of Wisconsin
- MPH, Public Health Studies, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health
- BS, Biology & Life Sciences Communication, University of Wisconsin–Madison
Clinical Domains
Depth + agility
- Primary depth: Psychiatry · Neuroscience · Addiction Science
- Clinical systems: Emergency medicine · Population health
- Evidence themes: Infectious disease · Dermatology · Cardiology · Oncology
- Approach: guideline-first synthesis and clinically grounded framing
Methods and Tools
Standards + execution
- ICMJE · GPP3 · AMA style alignment
- Evidence appraisal · data interpretation · claims discipline
- EndNote/Zotero · Track Changes · version control
- Medical review workflows including Veeva Vault when applicable
Quamaine C. Bond, MMSc, MPH
Medical Writing • Scientific Communications • Medical Affairs
I am a medical affairs and scientific communications professional with advanced training in clinical and translational research and public health. I translate complex evidence into clear, audience-appropriate deliverables that move smoothly through review.
I partner closely with physician SMEs and cross-functional stakeholders to preserve scientific intent while improving structure, clarity, and usability. This includes disciplined terminology, traceable sourcing, and reliable execution in remote, deadline-driven workflows.
CV Highlights (Web Summary)
- Claims discipline and reference verification (guidelines + primary literature)
- Clinical narratives, publication-style writing, evidence summaries
- Case-based vignettes, Q&A, rationales, rubrics, scoring anchors
- SME reconciliation, action tracking, version control, clean handoffs
- Medical affairs enablement: FAQs, briefing docs, advisory board materials
- Bias-aware, patient-safe language and health literacy optimization
- Therapy-area agility using structured evidence mapping
- Tools: Word (Track Changes), PowerPoint, Acrobat, Zotero/EndNote
Get in Touch
Clear, evidence-based communication for healthcare teams.
Share your deliverable type, target audience, and timeline. I will follow up with next steps, scope options, and a clean path to a review-ready draft.